This is a follow up on Supreme Corruption and 100% Conspiracy.

Now I showed in 100% Conspiracy how there was/is a conspiracy against me between my daughter's mother and her friend. Anybody who doesn't believe something like that could happen and has happened should read my new story Cindy Macken/UID Principal is a Bipolar Psychopath.

Now I asked the Vermont Supreme Court 20 questions in Supreme Corruption, and they responded back that I showed no new facts of law to expunge my record. New precedents are set everyday, and they just keep setting bad ones.

They have already suborned perjury against me twice, and I can really prove that they did not pay attention to anything, facts of reality, regarding my erroneous October 6, 2006 violation. They will never be able explain that.

Their rulings were hasty, and it's like they didn't look at the printed case or read my printed brief. I have the inside scoop that they don't even look at transcripts to verify citations so anybody can say anything that's not on record anyway in a brief, and the lazy Vermont Supreme Court wouldn't know any difference.

Also, a few years ago, I had filed a subpoena to prove that Mrs. Meek was lying in court about my sister getting her fired from her job--she was fired 'because of her own attitude and nobody likes her anyway.' So I filed a subpoena to prove this and, as always, followed rules of discovery and sent Mrs. Meek a copy.

She filed to have it quashed, without following rules of discovery, and Geoffrey Crawford allowed her to quash it. Of course he would, because he's the one who let her openly lie in court.

I appealed that, and the VSC upheld quashing a subpoena, which was meant to prove the truth. They (John Dooley--on the news a few years ago for something shifty, Brian Burgess, and Marilyn Skoglund) prefer facts of law based on lies over facts of reality based on reality and truth.

As long as the facts of law are based on lies, then the law shouldn't have any basis in reality, because their facts of law do not match with the facts of reality that I can prove with over 100 pieces of factual evidence and contrary testimony. Well, they don't even read transcripts, so it's not like the would know or be able to judge the facts of reality.

The facts of law are based on lies and have nothing to do with facts of reality when judges want to be hypocrites and unaccountable "soft heads." And that's saying it nicely, they really have no brains, compassion, or empathy.

As long as the system is failing like this, I would tell everybody to take everything to jury trials and be your own lawyers, because this truly is a criminal "justice system," and that would make it crumble. If this can happen to me, and the Vermont Supreme Court is going to blatantly ignore facts of reality to continue victimizing me and allowing my daughter to be victimized, then it can happen to others. They don't care.

The key question for them is, how can they side with Brian Grearson, dumbass judge who thought Brian Rooney looked like a nice guy, when he said, 'you removed yourself without incident on December 2, 2005, there was no awareness of her presence on January 31, 2006, but you didn't remove yourself from the Grange when you had an awareness of her presence on December 27, 2005...' how can the VSC side with Grearson on that ruling when I self-reported December 2, 2005 and January 31, 2006, and my PO wrote a distorted affidavit regarding January 31, 2006, and I was blind sided by December 27, 2005? They didn't even substantiate the false reports, which would have been the only thing to say I had an awareness of her presence.

Well, as Mrs. Meek said to me, "My parents have connections in the system," while we were still together." It's amazing that psychopaths like her and her family would have connections in the system, but as I have said, psychopaths side with psychopaths, and these morons ignore facts of reality, and that is because they do not care, have empathy, remorse, accountability, and I bet they don't even read printed cases or briefs, along with transcripts when they're being this blatantly stupid and corrupt.It didn't even take them two days, after my oral argument, to make their ruling denying my appeal, even though they said the briefs were good enough.

All I can say is John Dooley, Brian Burgess, and Marily Skoglund are complete idiots who can't put two and two together, or they are mixed up in something that would allow them to be "connections" for bipolar, psychopath, child abusers.

On another note, when I started my lawsuit in 2007, the public defender's office said that they would not represent me in future matters. On top of that, Judge Dennis Pearson told me that the system couldn't give me the relief that I want or need. If that's the case, then the system has no business in my life, especially when it has emotionally and psychologically raped me and put me in a position, after my wrongful violation, where a pervert guard grabbed my ass and groped my crotch. (I learned recently that the guards make deals and bets to see what they can get away with doing to people. Psycho...)

This criminal "justice system" is exactly that, a "justice system" run by real criminals, psychopaths, and people who don't care, have compassion, or empathy. (I have had very few good judges: Helen Toor, Cortland Corsones, and Christina Reiss. These people actually looki at facts and listen, unlike the higher court.)