bo
UID SCHOOL OFFICIALS ARE UNACCOUNATABLE PSYCHOPATHS< /u>
The following is what I wrote in response to a no trespassing order my sister and I were served on May 9, 2009. This is beyond absurd at this point and Cindy Mackin is not acting in the interests of my daughter, and who knows what other children, and she should be fired and never allowed to be a principal again.
MOTION TO VACATE NO TRESPASS ORDER
On May 9, 2009, my sister and I received no trespassing orders for the Chittenden East School District, but we were not given reasons why.

There is no justifiable reason for these to have been placed on us. My daughter goes to the UID School and has performances there, and this is just the school assisting Mrs. Meek in eliminating me from things to do with my daughter.

I spoke with Trooper Crick of the Vermont State Police on May 10, 2009 to find out what this order was regarding, and she said that she didn't know. She also explained to me that she was waiting to meet with another trooper to put together the final case they wanted to hand in to the State's Attorney's Office.

Either way, there is no reasonable justification for the no trespass order. My daughter goes to school there, and my sister and I, as well as my mother, have done nothing more than go to see one of her performances, which I would always do, regardless, and this order needs vacated immediately so that I may attend other events or performances my daughter has. Mrs. Meek brought her late and took her out early whereas I would let her have the enjoyment of the entire experience regardless of how I felt about Mrs. Meek, or whether it was her weekend. (She shouldn't be unsupervised with my daughter, and I know she has great fear with her mother and Mr. Meek.)

What the UID School has done is reprehensible, and I hope somebody's listening.

Also, on May 1, 2009, after Mrs. Mackin and staff helped Mrs. Meek violate court ordered visits, I did call the school to speak with her, while waiting outside Mrs. Meek's residence to see if she returned. Somebody did answer, and I asked for Cindy Mackin, but they said she wasn't there and tried patching me through the voice mail. (I do believe it was Mrs. Mackin who answered.)

The phone hung up instead of patching me through to her voice mail, and I called back, but there was no answer. I left a message to the direct line telling Mrs. Mackin that I thought she was a bipolar psychopath, not acting in the interests of my daughter, and that I hoped she liked having her time tied up in lawsuits, because the events of May 1, 2009 were unjustifiable, and this no trespassing order, filed on Monday, May 4, 2009, served on my sister and me on May 9, 2009 is just in retaliation to the legal actions to which Mrs. Mackin's and staffs' actions resulted.

These people should not be in their positions, and I will not stop, and my daughter already knows more of the truth than I wanted her to know at this point, but it is only because of the actions of UID staff and employees and Mrs. Meek that I had no choice but to tell my daughter some of the truth. (She stood there looking at me, while she was telling Mrs. Mackin she wanted to stay for the performance and wanted to know why she couldn't go with me, and then they dragged her off to the other building and locked her in with her and her mother, which she didn't like. I can't lie to her about this, and she is/was confused about May 1, 2009, because of Mrs. Meek, Mrs. Mackin, and school staff and employees.)